This is dumb. The entire post would have read much better had he written “I will not link to a competitor”, rather than branding Google guilty on the basis of vague suspicions against too-successful companies. I don’t know what Google may or may not do in the future, but ’til now every single thing they have done — from News to Froogle — has been based on their core: Search. Why should I judge the blogger acquisition to be any different pre-facto? (More to the point, it’s not a very big stretch from offering posting on Usenet to offering blogging services).

Comments Off

El Reg: Windows Server 2003 Web Edition comes without client access licences, with a 2gig limit on memory, 2-way SMP, and is $399. This makes sense for people running websites on ASP(X), but I don’t think Microsoft is going to win new customers with this one. The price-point to take on LAMP for web-serving is somewhere between $49-$99, possibly with SMP disabled.

Comments Off

Googlesyndication.com is the newest “content-targeted” advertising network on the web — you may have noticed it at places like blogspot and sf.net. Unlike Doubleclick and friends, however, there are no cookies and no flashing banner ads (great!), just classifieds-style text ads. It’s also context sensitive: like Google, you can plug in keywords to get ads that are relevant to the page they are on.

Comments Off

from the take-your-rss-feed-out-to-dinner dept: The 2nd Annual Chennai Bloggers Meet is on Sunday March 9.

Comments Off

Robert Scoble writes an open letter to Bill Gates. Dare Obasanjo strikes back. As Dare says, packing Open-source apps in-the-box is not likely to help MS against Open Source. On the other hand, I am not convinced that MS’ software is “commoditized” yet — not for 2-3 years, anyway. (Unlike soap and shampoo, creating software, especially office software, is hard to do right). Increasing value to paying customers, however, could.

Office Suites: What about sane licensing for Office on Terminal Servers? This would take the wind out of Star/Open Office in low end markets like call centers. Webserving: (according to even MS, this is one area where Windows’ TCO is higher than Linux’s) Where is a $49-$99 edition of Windows Server 2003 (Web edition)? Engineering/Academic workstations: (an area where Linux is gaining ground as organizations look to dump legacy Unix workstations) Where is a special edition of NT with enhanced POSIX compatibility, your command line shell of choice, an X server, bundled Interix, the .net fwsdk, shared source, plus the Win32 shell loadable on demand for a special academic price of $69 and maybe a full price of $249?

The problem is, Microsoft is too busy making money by the sackful for it to really listen to its most reluctant customers. Unfortunately, these customers are the ones leading the edge of a migration to Open Source right now, and they are the reason why Open Source, while as crappy in the desktop world today as Microsoft Word was in version 1, will ultimately become successful. And Microsoft, like every BigCo before it, will fail to react until it is far too late and there is already red ink (or less profits) on its books.

Comments Off

If there weren’t two deaths involved, this news about some not-so-happy post-India-Pak-match happenings would be funny.

Comments Off